Funny how comms people often find colleagues from other professional disciplines advise us about comms subjects of which they have little knowledge or experience.
Knowing how to tweet does not make a social media manager, any more than spending your pocket money on sweets doesn’t make an economist.
A little knowledge can give us an inflated idea about how expert we are in any given topic.
That is, they don’t know what they don’t know.
The communicator can respond in a few ways to these encounters
- Self-doubt: ‘S/he must think I’m an idiot’
- Professional-doubt: ‘Perhaps I am in a ‘fluffy’ dumb-ass job’
- Explosive anger: ‘Who does this numpty think s/he is?’
- Inspiration: ‘Perhaps there is wisdom in pondering on this fool’s proposition’
- Change-making: ‘It’s time to show the world the sophistication and nuance in the skills I am honing and the result of great comms’
- Resignation: ‘For the love of the sweet Lord, get me wine now’
I bet this happens in loads of professions – I’ve certainly seen it happen in communications, digital and marketing: the best experts are those who know what they don’t know.
And the self-proclaimed ‘guru’ is very likely to be the last person you want to work with.
I’ll happily admit that I’m learning as I go: through trial and error, reading and talking to people who are doing good things, and working out where I currently sit in the many grey areas where there are no right answers.
When people ask or comment about something blindingly obvious, ludicrously stupid or anything that displays they have a only basic understanding of an area I have experience of – I take it as a win. It reminds me I have an incomplete but considerable depth of knowledge that I’m proud to build on.
Here’s another doodle I did on this theme, from a recruitment angle. (I doodle and scrawl on comms and work stuff over at workitoutwithapencil.com if you want to take a look.)